Probabilistic models of cognition: exploring representations and inductive biases.
By T. Griffiths, N. Chater, Charles Kemp, Amy Perfors, Josh Tenenbaum. 2010
570 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Cultural Studies, Developmental and Educational Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Josh Tenenbaum
- Tomer D. Ullman
- Pamela K. Douglas
- Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
- Jeffrey S. Bowers
- Noah D. Goodman
- T. Griffiths
- Colin J. Davis
In Cultural Studies
- Tomer D. Ullman
- Laura Schulz
- Josh Tenenbaum
- Noah D. Goodman
- T. Griffiths
- Matthew Botvinick
- Adam Santoro
- Julian Jara-Ettinger
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Tomer D. Ullman
- Josh Tenenbaum
- Noah D. Goodman
- Julian Jara-Ettinger
- T. Griffiths
- Laura Schulz
- Jessica B. Hamrick
- Peter W. Battaglia
Citations in the corpus
- Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks (2018, methodology): “In a Bayesian model, inductive biases are typically expressed through the choice and parameterization of the prior distribution (Griffiths et al., 2010).”
- Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience. (2012, background): “Weiss et al. related this analysis to a variety of findings, including the tendency of automobile drivers to speed up in foggy conditions.”
- The neuroscience of learning: beyond the Hebbian synapse. (2013, background): “According to much contemporary thinking in cognitive science, Bayesian inference is everywhere in cognition, from perception to learning and causal reasoning (Chater et al. 2006, Griffiths et al. 2010).”
- Event-driven contrastive divergence for spiking neuromorphic systems (2013, background): “Our results contribute to a machine learning-driven approach for synthesizing networks of spiking neurons capable of carrying out practical, high-level functionality.”
- The Naïve Utility Calculus: Computational Principles Underlying Commonsense Psychology. (2016, background): “, [54]), and consistent with the Bayesian framework [55], this challenge can be solved through an appropriate inductive bias or prior.”
- Rational Use of Cognitive Resources: Levels of Analysis Between the Computational and the Algorithmic (2015, background): “The central question is what function an aspect of cognition serves, leading recent proponents of computational-level analysis to call this approach a “function-first” strategy (Griffiths et al., 2010).”
- Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension (2013, background): “(Although many experience-based processing accounts are framed in terms of relative ‘‘activation’’, rather than probabilistically, these two views can often be translated into one another [50–52]; see, for example, the discussion in [26]).”
- Relational inductive bias for physical construction in humans and machines (2018, background): “Such assumptions may be encoded in the prior of a Bayesian model (Griffiths et al., 2010), or instantiated via architectural assumptions in a neural network.”
- Cognitive computational neuroscience (2018, background): “A third and critically important class of cognitive model is that of Bayesian models (Box 3).(33,35,36,34,143,144,145,32) Bayesian inference provides an essential normative perspective on cognition.”