Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction

By Manfred Thüring, Sascha Mahlke. 2007

619 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e0c94826fa7bacbeff82ddc7f7de1ede4d6cbc5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Morten Moshagen
2. Meinald T. Thielsch
3. Gina Neff
4. Mandy Hütter
5. Karl Christoph Klauer

In Social Psychology

1. Péter Nagy
2. Morten Moshagen
3. Meinald T. Thielsch
4. Gina Neff

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Gina Neff
2. Péter Nagy
3. Guillaume Gronier
4. Morten Moshagen
5. Meinald T. Thielsch
6. Carine Lallemand
7. Vincent Koenig

Citations in the corpus

• Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory (2015, background): “Human–technology interaction is shaped by users’ emotions and perceptions to a great extent, and design and aesthetic characteristics, devices, or digital products may evoke certain emotions in users (Lim et al., 2008; Mick & Fournier, 1998; Thüring & Mahlke, 2007).”
• Facets of visual aesthetics (2010, methodology): “Although, in principle, there are several ways to measure visual aesthetics (including physiological measures, Kawabata and Zeki (2004) and Thüring and Mahlke (2007); formalized mathematical assessment, Ngo et al. (2000, 2003) and Papachristos et al. (2006); and pairedcomparison data, Schenkman…”
• User experience: A concept without consensus? Exploring practitioners' perspectives through an international survey (2015, background): “This observation is quite unexpected considering the fact that UX research (Thüring & Mahlke, 2007; Tractinsky et al., 2000) has shown that the links between usability and UX seem not to comply with this assumption.”