The development of emotion regulation: an fMRI study of cognitive reappraisal in children, adolescents and young adults.

By Kateri McRae, James J. Gross, Jochen Weber, Elaine R. Robertson, Peter Sokol-Hessner, Rebecca D. Ray, John D. E. Gabrieli, Kevin N. Ochsner. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2012

653 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The ability to use cognitive reappraisal to regulate emotions is an adaptive skill in adulthood, but little is known about its development. Because reappraisal is thought to be supported by linearly developing prefrontal regions, one prediction is that reappraisal ability develops linearly. However, recent investigations into socio-emotional development suggest that there are non-linear patterns that uniquely affect adolescents. We compared older children (10-13), adolescents (14-17) and young adults (18-22) on a task that distinguishes negative emotional reactivity from reappraisal ability. Behaviorally, we observed no age differences in self-reported emotional reactivity, but linear and quadratic relationships between reappraisal ability and age. Neurally, we observed linear age-related increases in activation in the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, previously identified in adult reappraisal. We observed a quadratic pattern of activation with age in regions associated with social cognitive processes like mental state attribution (medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, anterior temporal cortex). In these regions, we observed relatively lower reactivity-related activation in adolescents, but higher reappraisal-related activation. This suggests that (i) engagement of the cognitive control components of reappraisal increases linearly with age and (ii) adolescents may not normally recruit regions associated with mental state attribution, but (iii) this can be reversed with reappraisal instructions.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6db42b2eaea9858b629a3ae5754f2e0dd0cee988

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

  1. Maarten Vansteenkiste
  2. Bart Soenens
  3. S. Petegem
  4. K. Brenning
  5. Sarah S. Jaser
  6. B. Compas
  7. Kelly H. Watson
  8. J. Thigpen

In Education

  1. Sarah S. Jaser
  2. Bart Soenens
  3. Maarten Vansteenkiste
  4. Kelly H. Watson
  5. J. Thigpen
  6. Meredith A. Gruhn
  7. Alexandra H. Bettis
  8. Ellen K. Williams

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Maarten Vansteenkiste
  2. Bart Soenens
  3. Matthew L. Dixon
  4. Kalina Christoff
  5. Rebecca M. Todd
  6. Ravi Thiruchselvam
  7. B. Compas
  8. Sarah S. Jaser

Citations in the corpus