The Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI): Reliability and Validity in Female Offenders

By Kevin M. Williams, Demetra Andrews, J. Bonta, J. Wormith, Lina Guzzo, A. Brews. 2009

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6ccd585e2355dd8f799bf80d1130e411812b0f9a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. S. Wormith
2. J. Wormith
3. Demetra Andrews
4. J. Bonta
5. L. Jill Rettinger
6. D. Andrews
7. Lina Guzzo
8. A. Brews

Citations in the corpus

• General Risk and Need, Gender Specificity, and the Recidivism of Female Offenders (2010, methodology): “The cutoff scores used are those recommended in the LS/CMI manual (Andrews et al., 2004).”
• The predictive validity of risk assessment tools for female offenders: A systematic review (2015, unknown): “Andrews et al. (2011) conducted a meta-analysis of the predictive accuracy of the LSI-R;”
• The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Model (2011, background): “In regard to strengths-based assessment and treatment, the evidence is incomplete, but the rational arguments are so compelling that a focus on strengths is already part of RNR-based assessment and treatment (Andrews et al., 2004).”
• Sources of Variability in Estimates of Predictive Validity (2011, background): “The LS/CMI (Andrews et al., 2004) and the Level of Service/Risk-Need-Responsivity (Andrews, Bonta, & Wormith, 2008) include the Central Eight as part of a general risk and need section.”