Towards writing the encyclopaedia of life: an introduction to DNA barcoding

By V. Savolainen, R. Cowan, A. Vogler, G. Roderick, Richard Lane. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2005

594 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c7fb39e54889a71bdb972f6b14e1ee46537a51d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded (2006, unknown): “2005; Savolainen et al .”
DNA barcodes for species identification of euphausiids (Euphausiacea, Crustacea) (2007, background): “Often called “DNA barcoding” (Stoeckle, 2003; Schindel and Miller, 2005), the use of DNA sequences is becoming commonplace to confirm species identifications for taxonomic, ecological and evolutionary studies (Savolainen et al., 2005).”
Cryptic species diversity in a widespread bumble bee complex revealed using mitochondrial DNA RFLPs (2008, methodology): “The DNA character-diagnostic approach compliments the way taxonomists collate morphological or behavioural metrics when describing species, facilitating independent verification of taxonomic hypotheses; in cases where other taxonomic data are lacking or sequence information conflicts with current ta”
Standard Percent DNA Sequence Difference for Insects Does Not Predict Species Boundaries (2006, background): “Clearly, the use of DNA data to diagnose species and revise taxonomic problems will continue (Savolainen et al. 2005).”
Recent advances in DNA taxonomy (2007, background): “This large-scale application of molecular data is clearly bound to revolutionize taxonomy ( Savolainen et al. 2005 ), but the validity and practicalities of molecular approaches to taxonomy have been subject to a variety of criticisms (e.g.”
Recent advances in molecular techniques for the identification of phytopathogenic fungi – a mini review (2017, background): “…at any phase of life, (ii) enabling the discovery of species based on the phylogenetic analysis of nucleic acid sequences, (iii) providing insight for diversification of life, (iv) promoting the development of DNA sequencing tools, useful in the field of biodiversity (Savolainen et al. 2005).”
Now DNA-barcoded: the butterflies and larger moths of Germany (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera, Macroheterocera) (2011, background): “DNA barcoding offers a rapid, cost-effective alternative strategy for both the identification of described species and the discovery of new ones (Hebert et al. 2003, Savolainen et al. 2005, Mitchell 2008).”
bold: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org) (2007, unknown): “2003a; Savolainen et al .”
Taxonomic Reliability of DNA Sequences in Public Sequence Databases: A Fungal Perspective (2006, background): “Such processes, increasingly known as barcoding, hold great promise for simplifying and standardizing the identification of biological specimens [1–2].”
Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all‐taxa biotic surveys (2013, methodology): “DNA barcoding, the use of diagnostic nucleotide variation to identify species, is a further development that has used the COI gene as a primary tool (Savolainen et al. 2005; Stoeckle & Hebert 2008; Ward et al. 2009; Bucklin et al. 2011).”
The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. (2009, background): “The need for comprehensive and reliable species identification tools combined with early barcoding success with fishes (Savolainen et al., 2005; Ward et al., 2005) provoked the formation of the the Fish Barcode of Life campaign (FISH-BOL) initiative (http://www.fishbol.org).”
DNA Barcoding the Medusozoa using mtCOI (2010, background): “Further, we seek to verify that DNA barcodes can provide the means for a non-specialist to discriminate taxa that would otherwise be difficult if not impossible to identify (Savolainen et al., 2005, Schander and Willassen, 2005).”