DNA barcodes for species identification of euphausiids (Euphausiacea, Crustacea)
By A. Bucklin, P. Wiebe, Sara B. Smolenack, N. Copley, J. Beaudet, Kaitlin G. Bonner, J. Färber-Lorda, J. Pierson. 2007
113 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61e0fd7e45cc3e32cd8aea9eb417fefcde49de0c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
- Florian Leese
- Natalia N. Ivanova
- A. Bucklin
- Brian D. Ortman
- D. Steinke
- G. McManus
- M. Raupach
- Bernhard Misof
In Molecular Biology
- D. Steinke
- Florian Leese
- Paul D. N. Hebert
- Natalia N. Ivanova
- Martha Valdez-Moreno
- M. Elías-Gutíerrez
- A. Bucklin
- Brian D. Ortman
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- DNA barcodes for Cladocera and Copepoda from Mexico and Guatemala, highlights and new discoveries (2008, background): “However, most prior barcode studies on crustaceans have focused on marine species such as decapods and euphasiids (Bucklin et al. 2007; Costa et al. 2007).”
- Cryptic speciation and the circumpolarity debate: A case study on endemic Southern Ocean octopuses using the COI barcode of life (2011, background): “Potential uses of barcoding include identifying the full range of known species, highlighting previously overlooked species and enabling identifications through molecular methods (Hebert et al., 2003, 2004a; Ward et al., 2005; Bucklin et al., 2007; Smith et al., 2008; Steinke et al., 2009a).”
- DNA barcoding of Arctic Ocean holozooplankton for species identification and recognition (2010, background): “, 2003; Bucklin and Frost, 2009); euphausiids (Bucklin et al., 2007); other crustaceans (Lef ebure et al.”
- Genetic homogeneity and circum-Antarctic distribution of two benthic shrimp species of the Southern Ocean, Chorismus antarcticus and Nematocarcinus lanceopes (2010, background): “…uncorrected pairwise nucleotide distances were low for both species (Chorismus antarcticus: 0–0.0106; Nematocarcinus lanceopes: 0–0.0152), representing typical intraspeciWc diversity values of crustaceans (e.g. Lefébure et al. 2006; Bucklin et al. 2007; Costa et al. 2007; Radulovici et al. 2009).”
- Biodiversity and phylogeography of Arctic marine fauna: insights from molecular tools (2011, background): “A number of recent studies (Saunders 2005; Bucklin et al. 2007, 2010; Lorion et al. 2009; Radulovici et al. 2009; Steinke et al. 2009) have confirmed the utility of COI for barcoding of marine organisms.”
- Molecular and morphological methods for identifying plankton: what makes a successful marriage? (2009, methodology): “DNA barcoding has probably been the most widely applied molecular method for identifying plankton (e.g. Bucklin et al., 2007; Lin et al., 2008; Webb et al., 2006; for zooplankton, see www.cmarz.org).”