Variations in the geomagnetic dipole moment over the last 12 000 years
By S. Yang, H. Odah, J. Shaw. 2000
198 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Geophysics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c5bfcaa4dbafe61facdb109effd4ef36e0d775b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- I. Usoskin
- Monika Korte
- Catherine Constable
- G. Kovaltsov
- F. Donadini
- S. Solanki
- R. Muscheler
- M. Vonmoos
In Geophysics
In Molecular Biology
- I. Usoskin
- G. Kovaltsov
- S. Solanki
- Monika Korte
- Catherine Constable
- F. Donadini
- R. Muscheler
- M. Vonmoos
Citations in the corpus
- Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia: 2. CALS7K (2005, methodology): “Until now, dipole strength evolution of past millennia has been estimated through the determination of virtual dipole moments (VDMs) and virtual axial dipole moments (VADMs) from archeomagnetic intensity data [McElhinny and Senanayake, 1982; Yang et al., 2000].”
- A History of Solar Activity over Millennia (2008, unknown): “Therefore, only the virtual axial dipole moment 3 (VADM) can be estimated before ca. 5000 BC (Y00 model by Yang et al., 2000).”
- Solar activity during the last 1000 yr inferred from radionuclide records (2007, methodology): “However, due to the necessary averaging process potential short-term changes are removed and only 500 yr averages of the field intensity were obtained by this method (Yang et al., 2000).”
- ArcheoInt: An upgraded compilation of geomagnetic field intensity data for the past ten millennia and its application to the recovery of the past dipole moment (2008, unknown): “…with both the present compilation and the sub–data set selected in the way described above is that of the meaning of so-called VADM and mixed VADM/ VDM variation curves classically derived whenever enough intensity data are available [e.g., McElhinny and Senanayake , 1982; Yang et al. , 2000].”
- Large variations in Holocene solar activity: Constraints from 10Be in the Greenland Ice Core Project ice core (2006, methodology): “In order to level out short-term variations, which were assumed to be changes of the nondipole field [Yang et al., 2000], these data were averaged over 500 years (from 0 to 2000 years BC) and 1000 years (from 2000 years to 10,000 years BC) [ Yang et al., 2000 ].”
- Coupled climate model simulation of Holocene cooling events: oceanic feedback amplifies solar forcing (2006, background): “In addition, within the relatively large uncertainties of the geomagnetic field reconstructions (Yang et al., 2000; Muscheler et al., 2005), the long-term changes in the 14 C production rate can be explained by geomagnetic field changes.”
- The geomagnetic dipole moment over the last 7000 years—new results from a global model (2005, background): “[4] repeated the study for the last 12000 yr with an updated data set of almost three times as many data.”
- Geomagnetic field for 0–3 ka: 2. A new series of time‐varying global models (2009, methodology): “The change of the dominating dipole contribution is often estimated from archeointensity data by means of virtual axial dipole moment descriptions (VADM) [e.g., McElhinny and Senanayake, 1982; Yang et al., 2000; Genevey et al., 2008; Knudsen et al., 2008].”
- Grand minima and maxima of solar activity: new observational constraints (2007, background): “…reconstructions, which are based on alternative paleomagnetic models: one which yields an estimate of the virtual aligned dipole moment (VADM) since 9500 BC (Yang et al. 2000), and the other a recent paleomagnetic reconstruction of the true dipole moment since 5000 BC (Korte & Constable 2005).”
- Source of oceanic magnetic anomalies and the geomagnetic polarity time scale (2007, background): “Absolute paleointensities from archeomagnetic materials suggest that field intensities at 1–3 ka were approximately 40–50% higher than the present field (Yang et al., 2000) although nondipolar field variations undoubtedly result in considerable spatial variability (Korte and Constable, 2005).”