ArcheoInt: An upgraded compilation of geomagnetic field intensity data for the past ten millennia and its application to the recovery of the past dipole moment

By A. Genevey, Y. Gallet, Catherine Constable, Monika Korte, G. Hulot. 2008

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Geophysics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afd20e966d5da3b9dc881c7c5e2159ccd7c4aca4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. I. Usoskin
2. Monika Korte
3. Catherine Constable
4. F. Donadini
5. G. Kovaltsov
6. G. Hulot
7. Nils Olsen
8. Mioara Mandea

In Geophysics

1. Monika Korte
2. Catherine Constable
3. F. Donadini
4. I. Usoskin
5. G. Hulot
6. G. Kovaltsov
7. Mioara Mandea
8. Christopher C. Finlay

In Molecular Biology

1. I. Usoskin
2. G. Kovaltsov
3. Monika Korte
4. Catherine Constable
5. F. Donadini
6. G. Hulot
7. S. Solanki
8. N. Krivova

Citations in the corpus

• Dynamics of the Earth’s Particle Radiation Environment (2009, background): “The most recent model (Genevey et al. 2008) provides an updated paleomagnetic reconstruction over the last millenia.”
• The Magnetic Field of Planet Earth (2010, methodology): “Some studies (e.g. Hongre et al. 1998; Genevey et al. 2008; Valet et al. 2008; Korte et al. 2009) would suggest a general decreasing trend over the past millenium (amounting to an increasing trend in the presently negative g 0 1 coefficient), while others (Korte and Constable 2005; Gubbins et al.…”
• Evolution of the solar irradiance during the Holocene (2011, methodology): “Figure 4 displays the reconstructions of the geomagnetic field intensity, including VADM reconstructions by Knudsen et al. (2008) and Genevey et al. (2008), and the VDM reconstructions by Genevey et al. (2008) and Korte & Constable (2005).”
• Geomagnetic field for 0–3 ka: 2. A new series of time‐varying global models (2009, methodology): “The change of the dominating dipole contribution is often estimated from archeointensity data by means of virtual axial dipole moment descriptions (VADM) [e.g., McElhinny and Senanayake, 1982; Yang et al., 2000; Genevey et al., 2008; Knudsen et al., 2008].”
• Improving geomagnetic field reconstructions for 0–3 ka (2011, methodology): “Global compilations from numerous publications of archeo-9 magnetic data (Donadini et al., 2006; Genevey et al., 2008; Donadini et al., 2009) and10 paleomagnetic records from sediments with high accumulation rates (Korte et al., 2005;11 Korte and Constable, 2006; Donadini et al., 2009) are the…”
• A History of Solar Activity over Millennia (2008, unknown): “Data available provides good global coverage for the last 3 millennia, allowing for a reliable paleomagnetic reconstruction of the true dipole moment (DM) or virtual dipole moment 2 (VDM) and its orientation (the ArcheoInt collaboration – Genevey et al., 2008).”
• Geomagnetic field for 0–3 ka: 1. New data sets for global modeling (2009, methodology): “These compilations often include only the geomagnetic field measurements, the associated ages and locations; however, it has become obvious in recent years that other information like the material used, the method, or the dating technique adopted can be used as constraints to accept or reject a datu”