How mismatching institutional logics hinder niche–regime interaction and how boundary spanners intervene

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Circular Economy: Measuring Innovation in the Product Chain (2017, unknown): “Radically new technology is often expensive, suffers from technical imperfections and usually deviates from various socio-institutional rules and norms (Smink et al., 2014).”
Policy mixes for incumbency: Exploring the destructive recreation of renewable energy, shale gas ‘fracking,’ and nuclear power in the United Kingdom (2017, unknown): “Large incumbent firms typically lobby to resist sustainability transitions (Smink 2015; Smink et al. 2015; Smink et al. 2013).”
Disruption and low-carbon system transformation: Progress and new challenges in socio-technical transitions research and the Multi-Level Perspective (2017, background): “The struggles are being explored in recent debates about niche-regime interactions, focusing on socio-political ‘empowerment’ strategies by niche advocates [33,34,87], alliances between niche and regime actors to draw in more resources [35], activities by intermediary actors or boundary spanners [36”