Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system

By Stanley R Hamilton, L. Aaltonen. 2000

972 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6bd85320237aa0caa4c5eca5c1aa5cf5608fe8f2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

D. Louis
P. Kleihues
Guido Reifenberger
P. Burger
W. Cavenee
B. Scheithauer
L. Rorke
H. Ohgaki

Citations in the corpus

MILD‐Net: Minimal information loss dilated network for gland instance segmentation in colon histology images (2018, neutral): “In routine pathological practice, accurate segmentation of structures such as glands and nuclei are of crucial importance because their morphological properties can assist a pathologist in assessing the degree of malignancy (Compton, 2000; Hamilton et al., 2000; Washington et al., 2009).”
Retrospective study (2016, neutral): “[1] The early diagnosis of gastric cancer is still difficult.”
The WHO Classification of Tumors of the Nervous System (2002, positive): “The new Blue Book on tumors of the nervous system (1) and the digestive system (5) contain a wealth of genetic data, and the recently published volume on leukemias and lymphomas (6) demonstrates that, for many neoplasms, the cytogenetic and molecular genetic profile is often a definitive criterion f”
TNM staging of midgut and hindgut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system (2007, neutral): “G3 indicates a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma with high mitotic counts/Ki-67 index, fields of necrosis, significantly reduced chromogranin A expression and intense staining for synaptophysin, meeting the current WHO histological criteria [5, 8, 34].”
Epigenetics: The Science of Change (2006, neutral): “The size limits indicated for T1 are those defined by the WHO for tumors with “benign behavior” according to site-specific clinicopathological correlations [5, 7, 31].”