Indicators for national science and technology policy: how robust are composite indicators?

By H. Grupp, M. Mogee. 2004

280 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b9161fe95b05f634b44b1c508f03393214220c6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

The Impact of Formal Institutions on Knowledge Economy (2013, unknown): “To deal with complications like this one, there has been a variety of attempts by international bodies and countries to develop indices of science, technology or knowledge standing (see, e.g., Grupp & Mogee, 2004).”
The technology clubs: the distribution of knowledge across nations (2008, background): “…oriented studies have also tried to operationalize the approach by measuring different aspects of the process of knowledge creation and dissemination in a large sample of countries, and by investigating the extent of cross-country differences (Archibugi and Coco, 2004a,b; Grupp and Mogee, 2004).”
Constructing Consistent Composite Indicators: the Issue of Weights (2005, background): “…innovation or academic performance (see Cox and others 1992, Cribari-Neto et al 1999, Färe et al. 1994, Griliches 1990, Forni et al. 2001, Huggins 2003, Grupp and Mogee 2004, Lovell et al. 1995, Munda 2005, Nardo et al. 2005, Saisana and Tarantola 2002, and Wilson and Jones 2002, among others).”
Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys (2008, background): “Multi-dimensional charts such as the spider graph are one way to display multi-task-based results for organizational innovations (Grupp and Mogee, 2004).”
On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness (2018, background): “…changing the weights of certain indicators seems to affect several of the units evaluated, especially those that are ranked in middle positions.2 Grupp and Mogee (2004) and Grupp and Schubert (2010, p. 69) present two further cases of science and technology indicators, for which the country…”
Noncompensatory/nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries: a defensible setting (2009, background): “…innovation or academic performance (see Cox et al., 1992; Cribari-Neto et al., 1999; Färe et al., 1994; Forni et al., 2001; Griliches, 1990; Grupp and Mogee, 2004; Huggins, 2003;Lovell et al., 1995;Munda, 2005;Nardo et al., 2005; Saisana and Tarantola, 2002 and Wilson and Jones, 2002,…”
Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase Innovation (2015, background): “Advances have been made over the last decade to try to point researchers interested in innovation and science toward more comprehensive measurements of innovative activity (Grupp & Mogee, 2004).”