The accuracy and precision of underwater measurements of length and maximum body depth of southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) with a stereo-video camera system

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Validating the use of baited remote underwater video surveys for assessing the diversity, distribution and abundance of sharks in the Bahamas (2011, methodology): “…al.: Baited video as an alternative to longline surveys estimated using the BRUVS in the configuration used in this study, although this problem would be easily rectified by incorporating the stereo-video techniques described in contemporary baited-video literature (e.g. Harvey et al. 2002, 2003).”
Pelagic fish assemblages assessed using mid-water baited video: standardising fish counts using bait plume size (2007, background): “The strong link between fish swimming speed and body size (Plaut 2001, Krause et al. 2005) means that accurate estimates of swimming speed also require accurate estimates of fish size from BRUV footage, which are only possible through the use of stereo video (Harvey et al. 2003).”
Underwater video techniques for observing coastal marine biodiversity: A review of sixty years of publications (1952–2012) (2014, background): “As such, it also helps distinguishing individuals (Harvey et al., 2003, 278 2007).”
A review of techniques for the identification and measurement of fish in underwater stereo-video image sequences (2013, background): “Stereo-video systems have the advantages that the measurements are impartial and repeatable (Harvey et al., 2004), and calibration stability tests indicate very reliable levels of accuracy (Shortis et al.”