Validating the use of baited remote underwater video surveys for assessing the diversity, distribution and abundance of sharks in the Bahamas

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

What is Big BRUVver up to? Methods and uses of baited underwater video (2017, methodology): “…comparisons both within BRUVS (e.g. different soak times; Gladstone et al. 2012) and between BRUVS and other methods (e.g. BRUVS vs. longlines; Brooks et al. 2011), were also popular with 19 % of studies choosing to focus upon within-BRUVS method comparisons and 18 % on comparisons with other…”
Calibration of pelagic stereo‐BRUVs and scientific longline surveys for sampling sharks (2014, background): “Additionally, benthic BRUVs and scientific longline surveys were compared to estimate the diversity and relative abundance of sharks in the Bahamas (Brooks et al. 2011).”
Bait type affects fish assemblages and feeding guilds observed at baited remote underwater video stations (2013, methodology): “2007), while scombrids (bonito tuna) have been used as bait to assess shark populations (Brooks et al. 2011).”