Territorial Knowledge Dynamics: From the Proximity Paradigm to Multi-location Milieus
By Olivier Crevoisier, Hugues Jeannerat. 2009
289 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a93c2a293e237c688435859da9ae4358c504ce7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Michaela Trippl
- Franz Tödtling
- Markus Grillitsch
- Robert Huggins
- Bernhard Truffer
- C. Binz
- Piers Thompson
- Markku Sotarauta
In Political Science and International Relations
- Michaela Trippl
- Markus Grillitsch
- Franz Tödtling
- Robert Huggins
- Piers Thompson
- Markku Sotarauta
- Bernhard Truffer
- C. Binz
In Strategy and Management
- Michaela Trippl
- Franz Tödtling
- Markus Grillitsch
- Bernhard Truffer
- Piers Thompson
- Robert Huggins
- C. Binz
- H. Bathelt
Citations in the corpus
- Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces (2020, background): “New growth paths need to be anchored in a regional environment (Crevoisier and Jeannerat, 2009).”
- Combinatorial Knowledge Dynamics: On the Usefulness of the Differentiated Knowledge Bases Model (2012, background): “This mirrors a number of overall change processes in modern economies including “culturization” (Power & Scott, 2004; Crevoisier & Jeannerat, 2009), “integration of producers and consumers” (Goodman, 2002; Grabher et al., 2008; Humphreys & Grayson, 2008; Jeannerat & Kebir, 2010) and the emergent…”
- Institutional Entrepreneurship for Knowledge Regions: In Search of a Fresh Set of Questions for Regional Innovation Studies (2011, background): “To make the situation even more challenging, and simultaneously more interesting, Crevoisier and Hugues (2009) suggest that knowledge economy is a vast global playground for different knowledge and different players to interact in complex production ^ consumption systems that are multilocational in…”
- Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts (2017, background): “Another 16 stream of research could be related to the anchoring of external system resources in specific regions 17 and countries: How do system externalities that stem from international networks get anchored to 18 specific local contexts and how does contextualized knowledge get up-scaled to globa”
- A Network-based view of regional growth (2014, background): “…the extent of the market, allowing for increased divisions of labour and providing new ways to collaborate and coordinate across geographical distances (Gassmann, 2006; Drejer and Lund Vinding, 2007; Moodysson, 2008; Crevoisier and Jeannerat 2009; Trippl et al., 2009; Dahlander and Gann, 2010).”
- The creation of knowledge: local building, global accessing and economic development—toward an agenda (2014, background): “This has been demonstrated in recent research on creative cities and the development of urban knowledge, the connectivity of proximities and knowledge creation, the dynamics of creativity from the emergence of knowledge to its marketization, the role of temporary events as trans-local knowledge plat”
- Exploring the normative turn in regional innovation policy: responsibility and the quest for public value (2019, unknown): “The idea that regional innovation policies should enable regional actors to capture or anchor part of the global value and knowledge they help create for the benefit of the region is not new (Bailey, Pitelis, & Tomlinson, 2018; Crevoisier & Jeannerat, 2009).”
- Regional innovation policies for new path development – beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views (2018, background): “…according to Binz and Truffer (2017) might more strongly apply a ‘ lead-market ’ logic (Edquist & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, 2012): Strategic public funding of high profile pilot projects could try to anchor global knowledge dynamics to local valuation processes (Crevoisier & Jeannerat, 2009).”