Don't Just Lead, Govern: How Top-Performing Firms Govern IT

By Peter Weill. MIS Q. Executive, 2004

601 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Framing the Frameworks: A Review of IT Governance Research (2005, methodology): “To continue with the aggregated approach implicit in the work of Weill and Ross [2004] empirical analyses are needed to test the implementation of these ideas in real world settings.”
Attempting to Define IT Governance: Wisdom or Folly? (2006, background): “Accountability within the processes is essential and learning from one implementation to another, through iterative modifications in the processes must occur to ensure more adept sharing and reuse of IT assets [ 49 ].”
Crafting Information Technology Governance (2004, background): “IT governance does not describe what specific IT decisions are made; rather, IT governance is the set of decisions about who makes IT decisions (Weill, 2004) and how.”
Information Technology Governance in Information Technology Investment Decision Processes: The Impact of Investment Characteristics, External Environment, and Internal Context (2008, background): “To ensure alignment with the firm's overall vision and goals, IT governance is the practice that allocates decision rights and establishes the accountability framework for IT investment decisions (Weill and Ross 2004).”