Crafting Information Technology Governance
By R. Peterson. Information systems management, 2004
568 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fe1bb4dcdfbe5ebcbdad4df16b9b9e182e3c972
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
Citations in the corpus
- Understanding IT Governance (2010, background): “…Decision rights and accountabili-ties cannot be universally specified (Krcmar 2009), but are influenced by organizational (Grohmann 2003; Rau 2004; Peterson 2004; Weill/Ross 2004), judicial (Tjoa/Karagiannis 2005; Kozlova 2008), economical (Grohmann 2003; Peterson 2004; Rau 2004; Tjoa/Karagiannis…”
- One Size Does Not Fit All---A Contingency Approach to Data Governance (2009, background): “Decentralized IT governance allows greater responsiveness and flexibility with regard to business needs and customized solutions for each business unit [Peterson 2004; Brown and Grant 2005].”
- Using Enterprise Architecture Standards in Managing Information Technology (2006, methodology): “Applying the theory from the literature to the case of setting and using EA standards, we mapped the EA governance mechanisms discussed in the practitioner literature [40, 88] to the following categories of horizontal IT governance mechanisms based on Brown [11] and Peterson [68]: 1.”
- Framing the Frameworks: A Review of IT Governance Research (2005, background): “In addition, others [Peterson, 2004; Rau, 2004; Robbins, 2004] opted to address this topic from a more practical view of IT governance by examining the implementation of IT governance systems irrespective of the more theoretical frameworks.”