Review: what can structural classifications reveal about protein evolution?
By Christine A. Orengo, Ian Sillitoe, Gabrielle A. Reeves, Frances M. G. Pearl. 2001
50 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Materials Chemistry
- Lisa N. Kinch
- Nick V. Grishin
- Jimin Pei
- Bong-Hyun Kim
- Yuxing Liao
- R. D. Schaeffer
- Hua Cheng
- Shuoyong Shi
In Molecular Biology
- Nick V. Grishin
- Lisa N. Kinch
- Jimin Pei
- R. D. Schaeffer
- Bong-Hyun Kim
- Hua Cheng
- Yuxing Liao
- Shuoyong Shi
Citations in the corpus
- ECOD: An Evolutionary Classification of Protein Domains (2014, background): “Fold similarity usually refers to general resemblance in both architecture and topology and can result from either common ancestry (homology) or physical/chemical restrictions (analogy) [35,36,37].”
- Discrimination between distant homologs and structural analogs: lessons from manually constructed, reliable data sets. (2008, methodology): “We use 13 structural alignment-based scores to characterize each pair in the manually constructed and the SCOP-baseddatasets.Thesescoresbelongtofourdifferent types: (1) pairwise sequence scores, including sequence identity (id) and blosum score (blosum)60; (2) profile sequence scores, including comp”