The Elasticity of Labor Supply at the Establishment Level
By Torberg Falch. Journal of Labor Economics, 2010
144 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Education, Gender Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69faa8b8795534b916699a79b52a84e84153f121
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Ludger Woessmann
- Li Feng
- Tim R. Sass
- Guido Schwerdt
- Martin Schlotter
- M. Alan
- Eric A. Hanushek
- Douglas A. Webber
In Education
- Li Feng
- Tim R. Sass
- Guido Schwerdt
- Ludger Woessmann
- Martin Schlotter
- M. Alan
- Eric A. Hanushek
- Ludger Wößmann
In Gender Studies
Citations in the corpus
- The Impact of Incentives to Recruit and Retain Teachers in “Hard‐to‐Staff” Subjects (2015, background): “Falch (2010, 2011) studies a decade-long bonus program for Norwegian teachers.”
- Monopsony in Labor Markets: A Meta-Analysis (2020, unknown): “…this method typically produce estimates of ĥ that do not exceed 2, implying workers are paid less than two-thirds of their value to the firm, assuming firms can fully exercise their monopsony power (e.g., Bodah, Burkett, and Lardaro 2003; Falch 2010; Staiger, Spetz, and Phibbs 2010; and others).”
- Imperfect Competition in the Labor Market (2011, background): “Both Clotfelter et al. (2008) and Falch (2010b) report high values of the wage elasticity of separations—in the region of 3-4.”
- Econometric methods for causal evaluation of education policies and practices: a non‐technical guide (2011, methodology): “Galindo-Rueda and Vignoles (2007) is an example of applying matching techniques to the estimation of the effects of comprehensive versus selective schooling; evidence provided in Manning and Pischke (2006) suggests that matching-type estimation alone does not solve the endogeneity problem inherent i”