Child and Adolescent Psychological Assessment: Current Clinical Practices and the Impact of Managed Care

By M. Cashel. 2002

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69b43d54635e96bf497b4105dff4bb0353a536f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Steven Rathgeb Smith

In Clinical Psychology

1. Sandra M. Chafouleas
2. T. C. Riley-Tillman
3. Theodore J. Christ
4. Steven Rathgeb Smith

Citations in the corpus

• Making Sense of Multiple Informants in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (2007, background): “Given the prominence of performance-based (projective) techniques (Archer & Newsom, 2000; Cashel, 2002), more research should investigate relationships between performance-based, self-report, and behavior ratings.”
• Foundation for the Development and Use of Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) to Assess and Evaluate Student Behavior (2009, background): “The shift in assessment practices extended to clinical psychologists, counseling psychologists, and other therapists who reported a preference for observational and informant methods, such as interviews, behavioral observations, and rating scales, over projective and personality methods (Cashel, 200”