The neoliberalization of nature: Governance, privatization, enclosure and valuation

By N. Heynen, P. Robbins. 2005

356 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6989cadfc317634e2da7a53bed1911b2f97b893a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. D. Klooster
2. Thomas Wanner
3. Simon Springer
4. K. Mcafee
5. R. Duffy

Citations in the corpus

• The New ‘Passive Revolution’ of the Green Economy and Growth Discourse: Maintaining the ‘Sustainable Development’ of Neoliberal Capitalism (2015, background): “McCarthy and Prudham’s (2004: 281) assessment of ‘Polanyi’s theorizing of nature as a “fictitious commodity” remains a powerful ecological critique of liberal and now neoliberal capitalism’, for example, the fictitious commodity of land or nature in regard to the increasing commodification, privatis”
• Payments for Ecosystem Services in Mexico: Nature, Neoliberalism, Social Movements, and the State (2010, background): “…of neoliberalism, contradictions of “actually existing neoliberalisms,” and the neoliberalization of nature (Braun and Castree 1998; Brenner and Theodore 2002; Peck and Tickell 2002; Castree 2003, 2006, 2008a, 2008b; McCarthy and Prudham 2004; Barnett 2005; Heynen and Robbins 2005; Smith 2007).”
• Neoliberalism as discourse: between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism (2012, background): “Such criticisms have triggered an increasing propensity in the literature to replace discussions of neoliberalism with a new language of ‘neoliberalization’, which acknowledges multiplicity, complexity, variegation, and contextual specificity (see Brenner, Peck, & Theodore, 2010 ; England & Ward, ”
• Nature-based tourism and neoliberalism: concealing contradictions (2015, background): “…tourism might be considered as an expression or driver of it (for debates on neoliberalising nature see Bakker, 2010; Brand & Gorg, 2008; Castree, 2008a, 2008b, 2009; Heynen & Robbins, 2005; Heynen et al., 2007; Liverman, 2004; McCarthy & Prudham, 2004, pp. 275 277; Peck & Tickell, 2002).”
• The political ecology of ecosystem services (2015, neutral): “neoliberal approaches to the environment that commodify nature and create new sites for capital accumulation largely in the hands of a global elite (Heynen and Robbins, 2005; McAfee, 1999, 2012a, b; McCarthy and Prudham, 2004).”
• Standardizing sustainable development? The Forest Stewardship Council's plantation policy review process as neoliberal environmental governance. (2010, background): “Instead, researchers are called to examine neoliberalization as an evolving, variegated process, albeit one that frequently empowers a more destructive form of capitalism (Peck and Tickell, 2002; Heynen and Robbins, 2005).”