Neoliberalism as discourse: between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism

By Simon Springer. 2012

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2edc01ec674635cc1a9bf9b250fdf3d52997c06

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. Matti Siemiatycki
2. Rajeshkumar Venugopal
3. Kean Birch

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Matti Siemiatycki
2. Rajeshkumar Venugopal
3. Kean Birch

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Matti Siemiatycki
2. Rajeshkumar Venugopal
3. Kean Birch

Citations in the corpus

• Neoliberalism and the geographies of marketization (2016, background): “As Jamie Peck (2010) has argued for some time (along with his collaborators), neoliberalism has to be problematized as the thing that we need to explain and understand as geographically specific, rather than treat it as an essential condition, cause or outcome (also see Springer, 2010, 2012).”
• Neoliberalism as concept (2015, background): “…critique of neoliberalism from within is directed squarely at this super-sized, omnipresent model, particularly because it fails to account for contingency or for the wide contextual variance and contradictory types of outcomes (Birch & Mykhnenkho, 2010; Larner, 2003; Mudge, 2008; Springer, 2012).”