The anatomy of spatial neglect based on voxelwise statistical analysis: a study of 140 patients.

600 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. (2008, unknown): “Lesions that cause neglect are typically localized in ventral frontal or temporoparietal cortex and underlying white matter (Husain and Kennard, 1996; Karnath et al., 2004; Mort et al., 2003; Vallar and Perani, 1987).”
Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex (2005, background): “, with some authors pinning its neural substrate to the superior temporal gyrus (STG”
Typologies of attentional networks (2006, background): “Several rehabilitation programmes for patients with unilateral neglect, a disorder of the orienting syste”
Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. (2007, unknown): “These findings support a network view in understanding neglect.”
Age-specific CT and MRI templates for spatial normalization (2012, unknown): “In theory, the CT template and MRI template from older adults could be combined in a study where one does not have either MRI or CT scans from all individuals but a mixture of both (c.f. Dronkers, 1996; Bates et al., 2003; Karnath et al., 2004, 2011).”
Improving Lesion-Symptom Mapping (2007, background): “In these situations, analysis of covariance (Bates et al., 2003) or logistic regression (Karnath et al., 2004) are better options.”