Major Depressive Disorder is Associated with Broad Impairments on Neuropsychological Measures of Executive Function: A Meta-Analysis and Review

By Hannah R. Snyder. Psychological bulletin, 2012

1,569 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Cognitive impairments are now widely acknowledged as an important aspect of major depressive disorder (MDD), and it has been proposed that executive function (EF) may be particularly impaired in patients with MDD. However, the existence and nature of EF impairments associated with depression remain strongly debated. While many studies have found significant deficits associated with MDD on neuropsychological measures of EF, others have not, potentially due to low statistical power, task impurity, and diverse patient samples, and there have been no recent, comprehensive, meta-analyses investigating EF in patients with MDD. The current meta-analysis uses random effects models to synthesize 113 previous research studies that compared participants with MDD to healthy control participants on at least one neuropsychological measure of EF. Results of the meta-analysis demonstrate that MDD is reliably associated with impaired performance on neuropsychological measures of EF, with effect sizes ranging from d = 0.32–0.97. While patients with MDD also have slower processing speed, motor slowing alone cannot account for these results. In addition, some evidence suggests that deficits on neuropsychological measures of EF are greater in patients with more severe current depression symptoms, and those taking psychotropic medications, while evidence for effects of age was weaker. The results are consistent with the theory that MDD is associated with broad impairment in multiple aspects of EF. Implications for treatment of MDD and theories of EF are discussed. Future research is needed to establish the specificity and causal link between MDD and EF impairments.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/685fc8c2496a14230c4cc788f36194b8ce5788fd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Louis Tay
  2. Linda Siegel
  3. Warren Mansell
  4. Wim J. Riedel
  5. K. Boone
  6. Ian H. Gotlib
  7. Jonathan P. Roiser
  8. Lauren S. Hallion

In Pharmacology

  1. Warren Mansell
  2. Wim J. Riedel
  3. K. Boone
  4. Ian H. Gotlib
  5. Jonathan P. Roiser
  6. J. LeMoult
  7. Louis Tay
  8. L. Morris

In Psychiatry and Mental health

  1. Linda Siegel
  2. Warren Mansell
  3. Wim J. Riedel
  4. K. Boone
  5. David F. Tolin
  6. Ian H. Gotlib
  7. Jonathan P. Roiser
  8. J. LeMoult

Citations in the corpus