The Role of Developmental Limitations of Sensory Input on Sensory/Perceptual Organization

By G. Turkewitz, P. Kenny. 1985

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Early Experience & Multisensory Perceptual Narrowing (2014, background): “The likelihood that prenatal experience lays the foundation for the emergence of multisensory functions has been discussed in the past (Kenny & Turkewitz, 1986; Lickliter, 2011; Turkewitz, 1994; Turkewitz & Kenny, 1985).”
Intrinsically Motivated Learning of Real-World Sensorimotor Skills with Developmental Constraints (2013, background): “Therefore, like introduced in (Turkewitz and Kenny, 1985), children are not able to detect details in images, which is also a reason, of imprecise reaching movements.”
The development of infant intersensory perception: advantages of a comparative convergent-operations approach. (2000, background): “…differences between the sensory systems can significantly affect the ability of a particular modality to process a given type of sensory input at a given point in early development (Gottlieb, 1971; Kenny & Turkewitz, 1986; Lickliter, 1993 ; Lickliter & Banker, 1994; Turkewitz & Kenny, 1982, 1985).”
The Development of Embodied Cognition: Six Lessons from Babies (2005, background): “The differential timing or heterochronicity is one way that evolution selects for different adaptive outcomes (see especially [53]).”
Cognition as a dynamic system: Principles from embodiment (2005, background): “These different takes are all bound to the same reality in real time; this multi-modal nature of experience is a major driver of change in the system itself (Barsalou et al., 2003; Knudsen, 2003; Stein & Meredith, 1993; Turkewitz & Kenny, 1985).”