Diagnostic dilemmas in classifying personality disorder.

By W. Livesley. 2003

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/68315b9408fccf5065d9d1dfb061e9aa9f9edb74

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. (2005, methodology): “As for how this might be incorporated into a diagnostic system, Livesley (2003) suggests a two-step approach.”
A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. (2008, background): “However, researchers have increasingly noted the limitations of this categorical system (Clark, 2005, 2007; Krueger, Markon, Patrick, & Iacono, 2005; Livesley, 2003; Trull & Durrett, 2005; Watson, 2005; Widiger & Samuel, 2005) and have suggested alternative dimensional models of personality…”
Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model. (2007, methodology): “…have documented this concern well (Clark, 2005, in press; Krueger et al., 2005; Mineka et al., 1998; Watson, 2005; Widiger & Clark, 2000) and have addressed this issue specifically as it relates to the personality disorders (Bornstein , 1998; Lilienfeld, Waldman, & Israel, 1994; Livesley, 2003).”
Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. (2007, background): “However, conceptual difficulties and controversies have persisted (Clark et al. 1997, Livesley 2003, Widiger & Samuel 2005), there is widespread dissatisfaction in the field, and articles critiquing the domain are common ( Jablensky 2002, Livesley 2003, Millon 2002).”
Two studies on the prevalence and validity of personality disorder in three forensic intellectual disability samples (2006, background): “The concept of personality disorder (PD) has received much criticism recently regarding a number of features of the various classification systems, including their psychometric limitations, a lack of empirical support for the diagnostic concepts, the use of categorical as opposed to dimensional clas”
Comorbidity: A network perspective (2010, background): “Perhaps the most important development in psychiatric classification in the last 20 years is the effort by many clinical psychologists and some psychiatrists to replace Robins and Guze’s (1970) categorical approach to the medical model with a psychometrically based dimensional model (Livesley 2003; ”
Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: finding a common ground. (2005, background): “…four broad domains of personality functioning (Bouchard & Loehlin, 2001; John & Srivastava, 1999; Krueger & Tackett, 2003; Larstone et al., 2002; Livesley, 2003; Markon et al., 2005; Trull & Durrett, in press; Watson et al., 1994; Widiger, 1998; Zuckerman, 2002) that can be described as…”
Time perspective, personality and psychopathology: Zimbardo’s time perspective inventory in psychiatry (2011, background): “Time perspective may be related to clinical psychology and psychiatry, and lack of historicity and continuity is regarded as a core feature of personality pathology (Livesley, 2003), and has been linked to depression and suicidality.”