Market Structure and Environmental Innovation

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Environmental Policy and Technological Change (2002, background): “…suited to overcoming the joint market failure (negative externality from pollution and positive externality or spillover effects of R&D).11 Finally, Montero (2000) compared instruments under noncompetitive circumstances, and found that the results are less clear than when perfect competition is…”
Energy, the Environment, and Technological Change (2009, methodology): “15 For surveys of the literature and other overviews of modeling methodology, see the references given in Gillingham, Newell, and Pizer (2008), including Loschel (2002); Clarke and Weyant (2002); Grubb, Köhler, and Anderson (2002); Goulder (2004); Smulders (2005); Vollebergh and Kemfert (2005); Eden”
Permits, Standards and Technology Innovation (2002, background): “7Note that in a Bertrand game, strategic effects from the output market are negative under both standards and permits making the R&D rankings more favorable toward permits [12].”
Environmental Taxes and the Choice of Green Technology (2013, background): “Second, a common assumption is that the setup costs for the new technology are equal to zero (e.g., Montero 2002, Requate 1998).”