Cortical connectivity and sensory coding
By Kenneth D. Harris, ThomasD . Mrsic-Flogel. Nature, 2013
618 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67f2e66d6aa8e046c687d6c6d4ab36b9f44b5f56
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Robert Froemke
- Henning Sprekeler
- Claudia Clopath
- Tim P. Vogels
- Srdjan Ostojic
- Francesca Mastrogiuseppe
- Wulfram Gerstner
- Friedemann Zenke
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Robert Froemke
- Henning Sprekeler
- Claudia Clopath
- Srdjan Ostojic
- Tim P. Vogels
- Adrian Valente
- Manuel Beirán
- Alexis M. Dubreuil
Citations in the corpus
- Linking Connectivity, Dynamics, and Computations in Low-Rank Recurrent Neural Networks. (2017, neutral): “Actual cortical connectivity appears to be neither fully random nor fully structured (Harris and Mrsic-Flogel, 2013), and the activity of individual neurons displays a similar mixture of stereotypy and disorder (Rigotti et al.”
- Complementary roles of dimensionality and population structure in neural computations (2020, background): “Such sub-populations therefore bear an analogy with input- and output-defined cortical populations such as for instance defined by inputs from the thalamus [Harris and Mrsic-Flogel, 2013; Schmitt et al., 2017] or outputs to the striatum [Znamenskiy and Zador, 2013].”
- Predictive Processing: A Canonical Cortical Computation (2018, neutral): “Interestingly, these functional and anatomical characteristics are hallmarks of a subset of cortical neurons, prevalent in deeper layers (Harris and Mrsic-Flogel, 2013; Harris and Shepherd, 2015).”
- Receptive field formation by interacting excitatory and inhibitory synaptic plasticity (2016, background): “…networks or do not respect Dale’s law, and thus cannot reproduce the correlated stimulus tuning (co-tuning) of excitatory and inhibitory currents that is observed in sensory cortices (Wehr & Zador, 2003; Froemke et al., 2007; Anderson et al., 2000; Monier et al., 2008; Harris & Mrsic-Flogel, 2013).”
- Cortical feedback decorrelates olfactory bulb output in awake mice (2015, background): “Visual, auditory, and somatosensory experiments have proposed several roles for cortical feedback, including sharpening of sensory representations, or relaying information pertaining to expectation, reward, attention, learning, and action (Gilbert and Li, 2013; Glickfeld et al., 2013; Harris and Mrs”