Sharing as a form of anti‐consumption? An examination of toy library users

By Lucie K. Ozanne, Paul W. Ballantine. 2010

402 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/677b0000e6f3ad655f4bf244a6ae9f269e1eded0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Passions and the Interests: Unpacking the 'Sharing Economy' (2016, background): “…the extent to which participation in one ‘sharing’ platform was a form of ‘anti-capitalism’, found that individuals have different motives and identified four clusters: ‘socialites’, ‘market avoiders’ and two other profiles with no particular ideological motivation (Ozanne & Ballantine, 2010).”
Understanding Collaborative Consumption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior with Value-Based Personal Norms (2017, neutral): “3 For example, there are several older types of companies and organizations that have long since facilitated collaborative consumption like libraries, cooperatives, flea markets and neighborhood clubs (Albinsson and Perera 2012; Ozanne and Ballentine 2010).”
Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption (2016, background): “…developmental milestones their toy needs and preferences outpace the durability of most toys, thus access-based consumption offers a way for parents to regularly introduce new toys without excessive spending and waste (Catulli, Lindley, Reed, Green, Hyseni, & Kiri, 2013; Ozanne & Ballantine, 2010).”
The Relationship between Access Practices and Economic Systems (2016, background): “…the recent developments in the access economy especially with regard to consumer motivations and behavior (Hennig-Thurau, Henning, and Sattler 2007; Ozanne and Ballantine 2010; Lamberton and Rose 2012), consumer value and desire (Chen 2009), and associated resource distribution practices (Giesler…”
When do materialistic consumers join commercial sharing systems (2016, methodology): “According to Ozanne and Ballantine (2010), who identify the influence of frugality disposition on sharing intention, this study asks for the participants' frugality disposition using Lastovicka, Bettencourt, Hughner, and Kuntze's (1999) frugality scale (M = 5.27, SD = 1.17, α = .75).”
Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing (2012, background): “For instance, Ozanne and Ozanne (2011, 272) argue that toy libraries represent “a model of good stewardship over finite resources,” where participating consumers show clear signs of caring for the objects and others because they are sharing collective goods (see also Ozanne and Ballantine 2010).”
What we know about anticonsumption: An attempt to nail jelly to the wall (2020, background): “The most prominent cluster focuses on consumer resistance (i.e., Amine & Gicquel, 2011; Chalamon, 2011; Izberk‐Bilgin, 2010; Nepomuceno & Laroche, 2017), followed by green/sustainable consumption (e.g., Black, 2010; Black & Cherrier, 2010; Garcia‐de‐ Frutos & Ortega‐Egea, 2015), boycotts/consumer ac”
Sharing Sustainability: How Values and Ethics Matter in Consumers’ Adoption of Public Bicycle-Sharing Scheme (2016, background): “2014), as do the drivers of consumers’ general increase in sharing propensity (Lamberton and Rose 2012; Möhlmann 2015; Ozanne and Ballantine 2010).”