Analysis of pretest-posttest designs
By P. Bonate. 2000
303 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67686545e70f11fa9fb3790f9481ea5331adec9b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
- Edward Maibach
- E. Loken
- Reynol Junco
- Greg Heiberger
- Geoff Feinberg
- S. van der Linden
- Anthony Leiserowitz
In Statistics and Probability
- Edward Maibach
- E. Loken
- Reynol Junco
- Greg Heiberger
- Geoff Feinberg
- S. van der Linden
- Anthony Leiserowitz
- Andrew Gelman
Citations in the corpus
- Exploring Beliefs About Bottled Water and Intentions to Reduce Consumption The Dual-Effect of Social Norm Activation and Persuasive Information (2015, methodology): “Note that using difference scores as the dependent variable is statistically equivalent to using the post-test measure (Bonate, 2000)—the difference score is used here for more intuitive interpretation of results.”
- Manual training of mental rotation in children (2008, unknown): “Therefore, the conclusion that the training effect is due to the training per se seems to be valid, even if using difference scores in pre-and posttest designs might be problematic (compare Bonate, 2000).”
- How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: plain facts, pie charts or metaphors? (2014, result): “Note that the post-test in this case is statistically equivalent to the difference score (Bonate 2000).”
- The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades (2011, methodology): “Using difference scores is equivalent to a repeated measures design with two time points (Bonate 2000).”