A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions

By S. Jacobs, Nicolas Dendoncker, B. Martín‐López, David N. Barton, E. Gómez‐Baggethun, Fanny Boeraeve, F. McGrath, K. Vierikko, D. Geneletti, Katharina J. Sevecke and 22 more. 2016

371 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The future value of ecosystem services: global scenarios and national implications (2017, background): “…most easily and usefully done using monetary units, but other units such as time, energy, or land area are also possible (Wackernagel and Rees, 1996; Rees, 2006) and a plu-ralistic, integrated, approach to valuation is obviously preferred (Costanza, 2000; Jacobs et al., 2016; Pascual et al., 2017).”
Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? (2017, methodology): “Progress in this area is being made, often under the name of ‘integrated valuation’, and ‘participatory valuation’ where combinations of valuation methods are used to address the full set of values (Braat et al., 2014; Brown and Fagerholm, 2015; Jacobs et al., 2016; Kenter, 2016).”