Beliefs About Cognitive Gender Differences: Accurate for Direction, Underestimated for Size

By Diane F. Halpern, Carli A. Straight, Clayton L. Stephenson. 2011

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6715f2698216ae3e9575ddb4dbe5e315a6287e89

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. David Reilly
2. David L. Neumann

In Sociology and Political Science

1. David Reilly
2. David L. Neumann

Citations in the corpus

• Gender-Role Differences in Spatial Ability: A Meta-Analytic Review (2013, background): “18 for Ritter 2004; r = 14 for Hamilton 1995). In support of Hypothesis 1, the combined masculinity effect size for women was r = .23 (95 % CI lower = .11, upper = .34), Zma = 3.72, p < .001. This correlation for women was only slightly larger than that found by Signorella and Jamison (1986), who fo”