Student performance, attrition, and class size given missing student data
By W. Becker, John Powers. 2001
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6708239f76641cad550c48538c193aade9bd86f3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Michael A. McPherson
- Harinder Singh
- Ronald G. Ehrenberg
- Paul N. Isely
- D. Marburger
- Yilmaz Guney
- Laura W. Perna
- Anne Boring
Citations in the corpus
- Econometric Studies of Higher Education. (2004, background): “A different strand of literature, exemplified by Becker and Powers (2001) addresses the important question of how students’ class sizes influence their persistence in classes and the amount that they learn.”
- Does Mandatory Attendance Improve Student Performance? (2006, background): “Becker and Powers (2001) noted that sample selection bias could influence the empirical results.”
- Student Effort and Performance over the Semester (2005, background): “The number of students who did not provide complete data raises the possibility of selection bias when estimating the model of student effort and performance (see Montmarquette and Houle 1986; Douglas and Sulock 1995; Becker and Powers 2001).”
- Do Higher Grades Lead to Favorable Student Evaluations? (2005, background): “Becker and Powers (2001) have also argued that the class size at the beginning of the semester has a more significant impact, especially in large sections.”
- Determinants of How Students Evaluate Teachers (2006, background): “Becker and Powers (2001) discussed the sample selection problem inherent in studies such as mine: Students who do not expect to be performing well in class and those who do not like their instructors are more likely to withdraw from a class than are other students.”