Faculty Research Productivity: Exploring the Role of Gender and Family-Related Factors

By Linda J. Sax, L. Hagedorn, M. Arredondo, F. A. Dicrisi. 2002

398 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66e59302dcee7609db7ce6d2a61e59923b20e1a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. M. Faculty
2. Jisun Jung
3. Kerryann O'Meara
4. Jens-Christian Smeby
5. Corbin M. Campbell
6. S. Wolter

In General Health Professions

1. Jaleh Behravan
2. Y. Hedjazi
3. Jisun Jung
4. M. Faculty
5. Kerryann O'Meara
6. Jens-Christian Smeby

Citations in the corpus

• The Use of Bibliometrics to Measure Research Performance in Education Sciences (2012, result): “This hypothesis is supported by some studies (Hunter and Leahey 2010; Stack 2004), but not by others (Bozeman and Gaughan 2011; Sax et al. 2002).”
• Enabling possibility: Women associate professors’ sense of agency in career advancement. (2014, background): “Moreover, women report less satisfaction with the fairness and transparency of the reward system (Glazer-Raymo, 2008; O’Meara, Terosky, & Neumann, 2008), largely due to higher levels of isolation and limited access to the informal rules at play in reward systems (Barrett & Barrett, 2011; O’Meara, 20”
• Gender differences at critical transitions in the careers of science, engineering, and mathematics faculty (2010, background): “All rights reserved. xvi LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES 3-8 First Offer and Person Hired for Tenured Position, Percent by Gender, 60 3-9 Steps Taken to Increase the Gender Diversity of the Candidate Pool, 64 3-10 Number of Policy Steps Taken by Departments, 65 4-1 Average Measures of Recent Research Pro”
• Study of factors influencing research productivity of agriculture faculty members in Iran (2011, background): “However, previous studies have concluded that male faculty members tend to publish more than female ones (Sax et al. 2002).”
• Women in Academic Science (2014, neutral): “The Sax et al. study must be regarded as suggestive only, given that gender differences in STEM fields are different from those in the humanities in many other ways, and that during these decades, there were large compositional changes in the percentage of female academics engaged in STEM fields rel”
• Women academics and research productivity: an international comparison (2015, background): “Numerous studies have found that women publish at lower rates than men in the sciences (Kyvik 1990; Xie and Shauman 1998, Sax et al. 2002).”
• Departmental Contexts and Faculty Research Activity in Norway (2005, background): “research productivity (Porter and Umbach, 2001; Sax et al., 2002 ).”