Cognitive control in the posterior frontolateral cortex: evidence from common activations in task coordination, interference control, and working memory

By Jan Derrfuss, Marcel Brass, D. von Cramon. NeuroImage, 2004

326 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66b65a24a5847a1c960875c53afb20d3d4700bfd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Top-down modulation of visual feature processing: The role of the inferior frontal junction (2010, methodology): “IFJ activity has been elicited by many different types of paradigms, including task switching, interference control and working memory (Derrfuss et al., 2005; Derrfuss et al., 2004).”
Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm (2008, background): “Neuroimaging studies show activation in right IFG and pre-SMA in different inhibition tasks [68, 69 ].”
Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: Meta‐analyses of switching and Stroop studies (2005, methodology): “…paradigm frequently investigated with fMRI that, like the task-switching paradigm, was employed in our previous within-subject investigation [Derrfuss et al., 2004] allowing a direct comparison of metaanalytic and imaging results.1 1Similar to our previous imaging study [Derrfuss et al.,…”
Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior. (2014, background): “Different subregions of the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) have been implicated in maintaining and updating task representation, goals, and contextual information (51, 139, 551), and in exerting top-down control in mutual interaction with the pMFC (291, 331).”
RAIN MECHANISMS OF PROACTIVE INTERFERENCE IN WORKING EMORY (2006, background): “Similarly, Derrfuss et al. (2004) have also ound activation in left inferior frontal cortex in response to 2-back task that had lures compared with a 0-back ontrol.”
A computational model of inhibitory control in frontal cortex and basal ganglia. (2011, unknown): “…maintenance of stimulus-response rule representations (Brass, Derrfuss, Forstmann, & von Cramon, 2005; Derrfuss, Brass, Neumann, & von Cramon, 2005; Derrfuss, Brass, & von Cramon, 2004), is necessary for correct anti-saccade trials (Fu-nahashi et al., 1993; Johnston & Everling, 2006; Wegener et…”
Models of Response Inhibition in the Stop-Signal and Stop-Change Paradigms (2008, result): “The observed functional dependence between different kinds of inhibition is also consistent with neuroimaging studies, which showed overlapping brain structures in different inhibitory tasks (Aron et al., 2004; Derrfuss et al., 2004; Wager et al., 2005).”
Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. (2009, unknown): “…implicated in response selection (Braver et al., 2001; Rowe et al., 2002) and in the active maintenance of stimulus–response rule representations (Derrfuss et al., 2004, 2005; Brass et al., 2005), it is possible that this activation reflects a more deliberative response selection process…”
The Inferior Frontal Sulcus, not the Anterior Insula, acts as a late-stage attentional gate for the fast rejection of salient but irrelevant sensory inputs during cognitive tasks (2025, unknown): “To focus on attentional rather than motor responses, we excluded sites associated with hand or laryngeal movements and concentrated on the FEF ( Derrfuss et al., 2004 ), a key node of the dorsal attention network implicated in the rapid reorientation of attention to salient stimuli.”