Models of Response Inhibition in the Stop-Signal and Stop-Change Paradigms
By Frederick Verbruggen, Gordon D. Logan. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2008
747 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The stop-signal paradigm is very useful for the study of response inhibition. Stop-signal performance is typically described as a race between a go process, triggered by a go stimulus, and a stop process, triggered by the stop signal. Response inhibition depends on the relative finishing time of these two processes. Numerous studies have shown that the independent horse-race model of Logan and Cowan (1984) accounts for the data very well. In the present article, we review the independent horse-race model and related models, such as the interactive horse-race model (Boucher, Palmeri, Logan & Schall, 2007). We present evidence that favors the independent horse-race model but also some evidence that challenges the model. We end with a discussion of recent models that elaborate the role of a stop process in inhibiting a response.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73ebbbb20e4506512661796abd5cb6dac6def02b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Thomas V. Wiecki
- Michael J Frank
- Matthew Botvinick
- Randall C. O’Reilly
- A. G. Collins
- Peter S. Dayan
- David Badre
- Michael J Frank
Citations in the corpus
- A computational model of inhibitory control in frontal cortex and basal ganglia. (2011, methodology): “Here, we show that our model can also simulate the SST after we included the right inferior frontal cortex (rIFG) with direct projections to STN (Aron, Behrens, et al., 2007; see Figure 10).”
- Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. (2009, neutral): “, 2007), stop-signal task (Logan, 1994; Verbruggen and Logan, 2009), and anti-saccade task (Hallet, 1978; Butter et al.”
- Individual Differences in Heart Rate Variability Predict the Degree of Slowing during Response Inhibition and Initiation in the Presence of Emotional Stimuli (2011, neutral): “arousal cut-off scores that would ensure that we would have enough remaining trials for the reliable computation of SSRT’s Band et al., 2003; Verbruggen and Logan, 2009) as well as having cut-off scores close to the middle of both scales (5).”
- Single-Neuron Recordings Research in Children: Ethical Considerations, Feasibility, Technical Aspects, and Scientific Opportunities (2025, unknown): “A simple “change signal task [72],” for example, is transformed into a cartoonish game that is both intuitive/ easily understandable and fun but at the same time still examines a scientific question rigorously.”