Overborrowing, Financial Crises and 'Macro-prudential' Taxes
By Javier Bianchi, Enrique G. Mendoza. 2010
201 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66a320b7b774ec9196c8aed2a43e36542ec1259e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Hyun Song Shin
- Tobias Adrian
- Piergiorgio Alessandri
- Frank Smets
- Haroon Mumtaz
- P. Gelain
- Paolo Colla
- Caterina Mendicino
In Finance
- Hyun Song Shin
- Tobias Adrian
- Frank Smets
- Piergiorgio Alessandri
- Paolo Colla
- P. Gelain
- Caterina Mendicino
- Kevin J. Lansing
Citations in the corpus
- Dealing with the Trilemma: Optimal Capital Controls with Fixed Exchange Rates (2012, unknown): “A related strand of work emphasizes pecuniary externalities that work through prices in borrowing constraints, for example Bianchi and Mendoza (2010), Bianchi (2011), Jeanne and Korinek (2010), Korinek (2011).”
- House Prices, Credit Growth, and Excess Volatility: Implications for Monetary and Macroprudential Policy (2013, background): “14 Another macroprudential policy approach, examined by Bianchi and Mendoza (2010), is to employ a procyclical tax on debt which leans against overborrowing by rational private-sector agents.”
- Optimal Capital Controls and Real Exchange Rate Policies: A Pecuniary Externality Perspective (2015, unknown): “3 See also Lorenzoni (2008), Bianchi and Mendoza (2010), Jeanne and Korinek (2012), Jeanne and Korinek (2013) and Benigno et al. (2013).”
- Financial Stability and Monetary Policy: How Closely Interlinked? (2014, background): “39See Bianchi and Mendoza (2010) and Jeanne and Korinek (2012) for models in which pecuniary externalities due to fire sales give a rationale for ex ante prudential policy.”
- Financial regimes and uncertainty shocks (2019, background): “…Models where agents face occasionally binding borrowing or collateral constraints offer a natural way to think about this form of state-dependence (Mendoza and Smith, 2006; Mendoza, 2010; Bianchi and Mendoza 2010; Bianchi, 2011; He and Krishnamurty 2012, 2013; Brunnermeier and Sannikov, 2014).”
- Addressing Household Indebtedness: Monetary, Fiscal or Macroprudential Policy? (2017, unknown): “To capture cost-push shocks on wages, we specify an exogenous AR(1) process on θw,t = ηn,t/(ηn,t − 1) as log θw,t = (1− ρw) log θw + ρw log θw,t−1 + εw,t, (7)”
- Capital Flows and Foreign Exchange Intervention (2019, unknown): “See for example Caballero and Krishnamurthy (2004), Mendoza (2010), Bianchi (2009), Bianchi and Mendoza (2010), Jeanne and Korinek (2010) and Korinek (2011).”
- Which Financial Frictions? Parsing the Evidence from the Financial Crisis of 2007 to 2009 (2013, background): “Bianchi and Mendoza (2010) study a quantitative model of systemic risk, where agents do not take externalities of fi nancial fragility on others into account.”
- Managing credit booms and busts: A Pigouvian taxation approach (2019, unknown): “The assumption that debt is uncontingent can be justified e.g. on the basis that shocks to borrowers are not verifiable and cannot be used to condition payments.”
- What do we know about the effects of macroprudential policy (2018, unknown): “The borrowing constraint is occasionally binding, depending on private agents’ and policymakers’ choices, which determine the state of the economy (Bianchi and Mendoza, 2010; Jeanne and Korinek, 2012; Benigno et al., 2013).”
- Optimal Monetary and Prudential Policies (2017, background): “…risk taking and the volume of credit can also be found in a number of contributions that abstract from monetary policy [e.g., Bianchi (2010), Bianchi and Mendoza (2010), Jeanne and Korinek (2010)] or from prudential policy [Benigno et al. (2011)]: in these contributions, this occurs through…”
- Capital Regulation in a Macroeconomic Model with Three Layers of Default (2014, unknown): “subject to the budget constraint of the dynasty, ct + q H t h m t − bt ≤ wtl t + μ 1− Γ μ xt R t+1 ¶¶ R t+1q H t h m t , (10)”