Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education

447 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Smartphones usage in the classrooms: Learning aid or interference? (2017, background): “As most current students are digitally literate they are referred to as digital natives, in contrasts with their teachers who are referred to as digital immigrants as most of them learn by adopting the digital world (Wang et al. 2009; Evans 2009).”
Are Games Effective Learning Tools? A Review of Educational Games (2018, unknown): “Ke (2009) undertook his meta-review in 2009, reviewing 89 studies finding that there was a need for more longitudinal studies, less fragmentation in the literature and more empirically-based studies.”
A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games (2012, background): “It is clear that playing digital games leads to a variety of positive outcomes and impacts but it is also acknowledged that the literature on games is fragmented and lacking coherence (Ke, 2009).”