Evaluation and Decision Models: A Critical Perspective

By D. Bouyssou, T. Marchant, M. Pirlot, P. Perny, A. Tsoukiás, P. Vincke. 2000

416 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Economic evaluation of biological invasions—a survey (2005, background): “…the decision process on measures designed to counter biological invasions, especially the evaluation stage, and to aggregate this information into a ranking of different measures (Bouyssou et al., 2000; Vincke, 1992; Rauschmayer, 2001), has not yet been employed in this field (Rauschmayer, 2003).”
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development (2005, neutral): “As a consequence, the estimation of weights is equivalent to that of substitution rates: the questions to be asked are in terms of “gain with respect to one variable allowing to compensate loss with respect to another” and NOT in terms of “symmetrical importance” of variables [14].”
Preferences for multi-attributed alternatives: Traces, dominance, and numerical representations (2004, neutral): “Indeed, the framework of conjoint measurement has been adopted in many important works in decision analysis (see French, 1993; Keeney & Raiffa, 1976; Winterfeldt & Edwards, 1986) giving rise to many specialized assessment techniques (see Belton & Stewart, 2001; Bouyssou et al., 2000; Keeney & Raiffa”