Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis as a probiotic to Indian major carp Labeo rohita (Ham.)

By Rajesh Kumar, S. Mukherjee, K. Prasad, A. K. Pal. 2006

273 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Bacillus subtilis, a Gram-positive, aerobic, endosporeforming bacterium, was evaluated for its probiotic potential in Indian major carp, Labeo rohita. Labeo rohita (15 � 2 g) were fed a feed containing B. subtilis in three concentrations for 2 weeks, e.g., 0.5 (T2), 1.0 (T3) and 1.5 (T4) � 10 7 CFU g � 1 feed. The control group (T1) was fed feed without B. subtilis for the same period. Haematological and serum parameters were monitored at weekly intervals. The response variables were total erythrocyte count, total leucocyte count (TLC), haemoglobin, total protein, albumin, globulin, albumin^globulin ratio, alkaline phosphatase activity, alanine aminotransferase activity and aspartate aminotransferase activity. Fish were challenged intraperitoneally with a virulent strain of Aeromonas hydrophila after 2 weeks of feeding to the treatment groups and positive control group, while the negative control group was challenged with phosphate-buiered saline only. Clinical signs and symptoms, and mortality/survival percentage were noted in each group. The haematological and serum parameters were monitored each week and during post challenge on the third and tenth day. The B. subtilis-treated ¢sh (T4,1.5 � 10 7 CFU g � 1 feed) showed maximum per cent survival (87.50%), weight gain (35.5%), TLCs (3.23 � 10 4 cells mm � 3 ), haemoglobin content (7.4 g%), total protein (2.37 g dL � 1 ) and globulin content (1.28 g dL � 1 )d uring the pre-challenge. Enzymes showed higher activities during post challenge (Po0.05). The result suggests that B. subtilis can be used eiectively as a commercial product for use in aquaculture.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Immunology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64dcf1e90878dcc79a72c36833b377d5baefee39

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

  1. S. Hoseinifar
  2. E. Ringø
  3. Vikash Kumar
  4. Suvra Roy
  5. K. Ghosh
  6. D. K. Meena
  7. Uttam Kumar Sarkar
  8. Nermeen M. Abu‐Elala

In Immunology

  1. E. Ringø
  2. S. Hoseinifar
  3. K. Ghosh
  4. Vikash Kumar
  5. Suvra Roy
  6. D. K. Meena
  7. Uttam Kumar Sarkar
  8. M. Soltani

Citations in the corpus