Two-Dimensional Multiangle, Multigroup Neutrino Radiation-Hydrodynamic Simulations of Postbounce Supernova Cores

By Christian D. Ott, Adam Burrows, L. Dessart, E. Livne. 2008

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We perform axisymmetric (2D) multiangle, multigroup neutrino radiation-hydrodynamic calculations of the postbounce phase of core-collapse supernovae using a genuinely 2D discrete-ordinate (Sn) method. We follow the long-term postbounce evolution of the cores of one nonrotating and one rapidly rotating 20 M☉ stellar model for ~400 milliseconds from 160 to ~550 ms after bounce. We present a multidimensional analysis of the multiangle neutrino radiation fields and compare in detail with counterpart simulations carried out in the 2D multigroup flux-limited diffusion (MGFLD) approximation to neutrino transport. We find that 2D multiangle transport is superior in capturing the global and local radiation-field variations associated with rotation-induced and SASI-induced aspherical hydrodynamic configurations. In the rotating model, multiangle transport predicts much larger asymptotic neutrino flux asymmetries with pole-to-equator ratios of up to ~2.5, while MGFLD tends to sphericize the radiation fields already in the optically semitransparent postshock regions. Along the poles, the multiangle calculation predicts a dramatic enhancement of the neutrino heating by up to a factor of 3, which alters the postbounce evolution and results in greater polar shock radii and an earlier onset of the initially rotationally weakened SASI. In the nonrotating model, differences between multiangle and MGFLD calculations remain small at early times when the postshock region does not depart significantly from spherical symmetry. At later times, however, the growing SASI leads to large-scale asymmetries and the multiangle calculation predicts up to 30% higher average integral neutrino energy deposition rates than MGFLD.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64b9471f82fc1a01d4eb9befd9c5d47d5199ff23

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Bernhard Müller
  2. Hans-Thomas Janka
  3. Adam Burrows
  4. Christian D. Ott
  5. E. O’Connor
  6. Andreas Marek
  7. K. Kotake
  8. Sean M. Couch

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Bernhard Müller
  2. Hans-Thomas Janka
  3. Adam Burrows
  4. E. O’Connor
  5. K. Kotake
  6. Christian D. Ott
  7. Andreas Marek
  8. Sean M. Couch

Citations in the corpus