Intentionality
By J. McGregor. Journal of Object Technology, 2010
582 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems, Strategy and Management, Human-Computer Interaction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/649193dad548b4940894b53bcf17cdc8195789ee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems
- Michael Haugh
- Georges M. Fadel
- Elisabeth Pacherie
- Tim Bayne
- Fenghui Zhang
- István Kecskés
- Jonathan R. A. Maier
- Anne Feryok
In Strategy and Management
- Michael Haugh
- Georges M. Fadel
- Elisabeth Pacherie
- Tim Bayne
- Fenghui Zhang
- István Kecskés
- Jonathan R. A. Maier
- Anne Feryok
In Human-Computer Interaction
- Michael Haugh
- Georges M. Fadel
- Elisabeth Pacherie
- Tim Bayne
- Fenghui Zhang
- István Kecskés
- Jonathan R. A. Maier
- Anne Feryok
Citations in the corpus
- Towards a dynamic theory of intentions (2009, background): “For instance, Searle (1983) distinguishes between prior intentions and intentions-in-action, Bratman (1987) between future-directed and present-directed intentions, Brand (1984) between prospective and immediate intentions, Bach (1978) between intentions and executive representations, and Mele…”
- The Phenomenology of Agency (2008, background): “11 In his discussion of the experience of freedom, Searle (2001) fails to distinguish the question of whether it is possible to experience one’s actions as not having fully sufficient psychological causes from the question of whether it is possible to experience one’s actions as not having fully suf”
- Belief Through Thick and Thin (2015, background): “So we take it that one historical challenge to traditional representational views of belief (as seen in theories ranging from Fodor 1990 to Searle 1983) is that they must somehow account for the continuous nature of belief.”
- Affordance based design: a relational theory for design (2009, background): “From the above definitions it is evident that the concept of function denotes what an artifact is intended to do (cf., Dennett and Haugeland 1987).”
- Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: a socio-cognitive approach (2009, background): “According to this view, communication is not always dependent on speaker intentions in the Gricean sense (e.g., Verschueren 1999; Nuyts 2000; Mey 2001; Haugh 2008).”
- The Development of Play (2015, background): “One possible explanation put forth for why children can attribute pretense a full 2 years earlier than they can attribute false belief was “direction of fit” (Gopnik & Slaughter, 1991; Searle, 1983).”
- Language Teacher Cognition in Applied Linguistics Research: Revisiting the Territory, Redrawing the Boundaries, Reclaiming the Relevance (2015, background): “In philosophy, intentionality is the aspect of mental processes or states that is about things; that is, perceiving, thinking, or feeling do not occur without something being perceived, thought, or felt, and may underlie all mental states or even consciousness (Pierre, 2014).”
- Intention in pragmatics (2008, background): “…an a priori plan or motivation underlying an action), and intentionality in the more broad philosophical sense inherited from Brentano of ‘‘aboutness’’ or ‘‘directedness’’ (Nuyts 2000), and so is presumably arguing for the importance of intentionality rather than intention per se in communication.”