Towards a dynamic theory of intentions

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Sense of Control and the Sense of Agency (2007, background): “PACHERIE: SENSE OF CONTROL 3 As I have argued elsewhere (Pacherie, 2000, 2003, 2006), three main stages can be distinguished in the process of action specification, corresponding to the formation of future-directed intentions (F-intentions), present-directed intentions (P-intentions) and motor…”
Multiple aspects in the sense of agency (2012, background): “Moreover, and obviously, if the only thing I did were to thoughtfully deliberate and decide to do X, that would not be sufficient for generating SA for doing X, since I might never get around to 2 The distinction between F-intentions and P-intentions is a relative one that depends not only on time d”
Social Constraints on the Direct Perception of Emotions and Intentions (2014, background): “Opposing this picture, philosophers, such as Wittgenstein, phenomenologists like Scheler (1954) and MerleauPonty, and philosophers of mind like Duddington (1918), Dretske (1973), and Cassam (2007), have, to different extents, argued against the principle of imperceptibility.”
Intentions and Motor Representations: the Interface Challenge (2017, background): “…intentions-in-action, Bratman (1987) between future-directed and present-directed intentions, Brand (1984) between prospective and immediate intentions, Bach (1978) between intentions and executive representations, and Mele (1992) and Pacherie (2006, 2008) between distal and proximal intentions.”