The Cross Section of Analyst Recommendations

By Sorin M. Sorescu, Avanidhar Subrahmanyam. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2004

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/643d2576c8ad506e50ab5296f3853a2c131b3dea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Xueming Luo
2. Christian Homburg
3. J. Wieseke
4. A. Cheung

In Finance

1. Christian Homburg
2. Xueming Luo
3. J. Wieseke
4. Gerard J. Tellis
5. Seshadri Tirunillai
6. C. Bhattacharya
7. Fotios Pasiouras
8. Abhishek Borah

Citations in the corpus

• Do Analysts Herd? An Analysis of Recommendations and Market Reactions (2010, unknown): “10 Sorescu and Subrahmanyam(2006) report that the market reactions are stronger for two level revisions than for one level revisions.”
• Customer Satisfaction, Analyst Stock Recommendations, and Firm Value (2010, background): “Sorescu and Subrahmanyam 2006 !”
• The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns: What Have We Learnt from the Past Twenty-Five Years of Research? (2010, unknown): “Sorescu and Subrahmanyam (2006) indicate that the drift is only for experienced analysts; revisions by inexperienced analysts actually experience price reversals.”
• The Financial Analyst Forecasting Literature: A Taxonomy with Suggestions for Further Research (2008, unknown): “Sorescu and Subrahmanyam (2006) Archival, I/B/E/S, 1993-2002.”