FastSLAM: a factored solution to the simultaneous localization and mapping problem
By Michael Montemerlo, Sebastian Thrun, Daphne Koller, Ben Wegbreit. AAAI/IAAI, 2002
2,991 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6410aacd3f02f12bf78a8b3e5e664d263cee2183
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- Daniel Cremers
- Davide Scaramuzza
- Wolfram Burgard
- Andrew J. Davison
- Vladlen Koltun
- Michael Kaess
- Sebastian Thrun
- Juan D. Tardós
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Vladlen Koltun
- Jitendra Malik
- Andreas Geiger
- Dacheng Tao
- Trevor Darrell
- Abhinav Kumar Gupta
- Andrew Zisserman
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Sebastian Thrun
- Andrew Howard
- John J. Leonard
- Tim Bailey
- Wolfram Burgard
- H. F. Durrant-Whyte
- Andrew J. Davison
- Michael Montemerlo
Citations in the corpus
- Locating in fingerprint space: wireless indoor localization with little human intervention (2012, methodology): “While the robotics and computer vision communities have developed techniques for jointly estimating the locations of a robot and a map of an environment, the nature of wireless signal strength prohibits the use of standard SLAM techniques [30, 19].”
- The SLAM problem: a survey (2008, methodology): “landmark position and orientation; therefore, there are no important papers using PF for the whole SLAM framework, but there exist few works that deal with the SLAM problem using a combination of PF with other techniques, for instance, the FastSLAM [24] and the fastSLAM2.”
- Robotic mapping: a survey (2003, methodology): “Some techniques, such as the FastSLAM algorithm described in [67], promise a reduction to O(log K) complexity for certain situation, by using non-classical statistical sampling techniques for robot path estimation [29, 71] along with efficient tree representations.”
- Multiple‐Robot Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: A Review (2016, background): “0 (Montemerlo et al., 2002) to multiple robots in a featurebased environment.”
- Visual SLAM: Why filter? (2012, positive): “Other approaches for SLAM are based on Rao-Blackwellised particle filters (RBPF) [35] such as Sim et al.”
- Variational End-to-End Navigation and Localization (2018, methodology): “As opposed to traditional methods for autonomous driving which typically rely on distinct algorithms for localization and mapping [7], [8], [9], planning [10], [11], [12], and control [13], [14], end-to-end algorithms attempt to collapse the problem (directly from raw sensory data to output control ”
- Particle Filter SLAM with High Dimensional Vehicle Model (2009, methodology): “The Fastslam algorithm [26] is extended by not only including the map states in the linear part, but also the states corresponding to a linear Gaussian substructure present in the model for the platform.”
- Computer Vision for Autonomous Vehicles: Problems, Datasets and State-of-the-Art (2017, methodology): “Early approaches to SLAM have addressed the problem using Bayesian formulations using extended Kalman filters (Smith et al. (1987)) or particle filters (Montemerlo et al. (2002)).”
- Advanced closed loop visual navigation for micro aerial vehicles (2014, methodology): “For ground-vehicles, without the help of any artificial beacons or GPS, ego-motion and scene estimation is well explored, and often relies on the popular 2D SICK laser range-finders and wheel odometry used in a Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM) Framework, as for instance shown by Montemer”
- Model based vehicle detection and tracking for autonomous urban driving (2009, methodology): “Briefly, following the derivation in Montemerlo (2003) , it is straightforward to show that the importance weights wt should be:”
- PL-SLAM: A Stereo SLAM System Through the Combination of Points and Line Segments (2017, methodology): “Among the most successful proposals we can highlight FastSLAM [21], PTAM [22] and, more recently, ORB-SLAM [12], which relies on a fast and continuous tracking of ORB features [23], and a local bundle adjustment step with the continuous observations of the point features.”
- Physically consistent state estimation and system identification for contacts (2015, methodology): “problem is very similar to ours [7] [8].”