The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment.

By R. Curtin, S. Presser, E. Singer. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2000

1,095 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63b41bc8e6d0e372c1a1269a32e359f95adb1774

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Separating refusal bias and non-contact bias: evidence from UK national surveys (2002, background): “%) and found few differences in substantive results; Curtin et al (2000) simulated the effects of reduced efforts and, again, found few effects on survey results.”
How Social Processes Distort Measurement: The Impact of Survey Nonresponse on Estimates of Volunteer Work in the United States1 (2008, neutral): “Keeter et al. (2000), Curtin, Presser, and Singer (2000), and Merkle and Edelman (2002) report little, if any, link between nonresponse rates and bias, and a meta-analysis by Groves (2006) shows only a weak relationship between nonresponse level and bias in studies that had validation measures.”
RECONSIDERING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED NEIGHBORHOOD RACIAL COMPOSITION AND WHITES' PERCEPTIONS OF VICTIMIZATION RISK: DO RACIAL STEREOTYPES MATTER? ∗ (2012, background): “Importantly, recent research has shown that response rates are not significantly related to nonresponse bias in random telephone surveys (Curtin, Presser, and Singer, 2000; Keeter et al., 2000, Keeter et al., 2006).”
Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires: Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias (2003, background): “The higher of these response rates is identical to that of the Survey of Consumer Attitudes (approximately 70 percent) in 1979 (Curtin, Presser, and Singer 2000).”
The grit effect: predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage (2013, background): “2Past research suggests that Whites (Voigt et al., 2003), females (Moore and Tarnai, 2002) and individuals with higher education (Curtin et al., 2000) are more likely to participate in surveys, which may explain the slightly skewed demographic distribution in the present study.”
Effort in Phone Survey Response Rates: The Effects of Vendor and Client-Controlled Factors (2006, background): “More recent research has shown that the effect of nonresponse on data is less critical than previously thought ( Curtin, Presser, and Singer 2000; Keeter et al. 2000).”
Citizens’ Perceptions of Flood Hazard Adjustments (2013, background): “Moreover, reports by Curtin, Presser, and Singer (2000) and Keeter, Miller, Kohut, Groves, and Presser (2000) indicate that low response rates do not appear to 1002 Environment and Behavior 45(8) have biased surveys’ estimates of means and proportions.”
The internet as psychological laboratory. (2006, result): “Although there were modest differences in the demographic makeup of the samples obtained, the substantive conclusions were essentially identical across the two surveys (Keeter et al. 2000; see also Curtin et al. 2000, Merkle & Edelman 2002 for similar conclusions).”
Households' Perceived Personal Risk and Responses in a Multihazard Environment (2008, background): “Moreover, recent research by Curtin et al. (2000) and Keeter et al.”
Does Giving People Their Preferred Survey Mode Actually Increase Survey Participation Rates? An Experimental Examination (2012, background): “As survey response rates decline and costs increase (Curtin, Presser, and Singer 2000; de Leeuw and de Heer 2002), survey organizations are increasingly turning to mixed mode survey designs.”
Risk Area Accuracy and Hurricane Evacuation Expectations of Coastal Residents (2006, background): “Moreover, reports by Curtin, Presser, and Singer (2000); Keeter, Miller, Kohut, Groves, and Presser (2000); and Lindell and Perry (2000) indicate low response rates do not appear to bias central tendency estimates such as means and proportions.”
Indicators for the representativeness of survey response (2009, background): “Curtin, Presser and Singer (2000) , Groves, Presser and Dipko (2004), Groves (2006), Groves and Peytcheva (2006), Keeter et al. (2000), Merkle and Edelman (2002), Heerwegh et al. (2007) and Schouten (2004).”
Non-response in student surveys: The Role of Demographics, Engagement and Personality (2005, background): “Gender has also been found to play a significant role in survey response, with women responding in greater proportions than men (Curtin et al., 2000; Groves and Couper, 1996; Moore and Tarnai, 2002; Singer et al., 2000).”