Effort in Phone Survey Response Rates: The Effects of Vendor and Client-Controlled Factors

By Christopher McCarty, Mark C. House, J. Harman, S. Richards. 2006

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aea3e22dff2f1d94c8eda0aca983089f637abfef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Ryan T. Howell
2. Jacinta M. Gau

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jia Wei Zhang
2. Ryan T. Howell
3. Jacinta M. Gau

In Statistics and Probability

1. Ryan T. Howell
2. Jacinta M. Gau

Citations in the corpus

• Validating a brief measure of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (2013, background): “Third, longer questionnaires decrease response rates in non-captive audiences taken from the general population, as compared to typical college students completing surveys in class for credit (McCarty et al., 2006).”
• A longitudinal analysis of citizens' attitudes about police (2010, background): “This response rate is not ideal, but it is fairly typical of the current response rates researchers are achieving in mail and telephone surveys (Curtin et al., 2005; Gau and Pratt, 2008; Holtfreter et al., 2008; McCarty et al., 2006).”