Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires: Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias

By Allyson Holbrook, Melanie C. Green, J. Krosnick. 2003

986 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a18a550cb6f7e4dd376bf072c388fa3c7471670

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The value of online surveys (2005, background): “…with questionable response rates (such as mall surveys), respondent time pressure, and the difficulty in getting demographics (see, for example, Alreck and Settle, 2004; Bowers, 1998/Bowers, 1998/1999; Brennan, 1997; Goldsmith, 1989; Holbrook et al., 2003; Malhotra, 2004; Presser and Zhao 1992).”
Telephone Versus Face-to-Face Interviews (2013, background): “A respondent must interpret the meaning and intent of each question, retrieve all relevant information from memory, integrate that information into a summary judgment, and report that judgment accurately’’ (Holbrook et al. 2003:82).”
Sensitive questions in surveys. (2007, methodology): “We found only one new study (Holbrook et al., 2003) on the differences between telephone and face-to-face interviewing that was not covered in de Leeuw and van der Zouwen’s (1988) meta-analysis and did not undertake a new meta-analysis on this issue.”
Item non‐response rates: a comparison of online and paper questionnaires (2009, background): “It met all eight ‘necessary features’ for the valid comparison of mode effects identified by Holbrook, Green, and Krosnick (2003) with the possible caveat that the context for the delivery of the questionnaires differed slightly – the paper questionnaires being administered in normal classrooms and…”
Determinants of Turnout and Candidate Choice in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Illuminating the Impact of Racial Prejudice and Other Considerations (2009, background): “…holding a socially sanctioned opinion (for reviews, see Krosnick 1999; Tourangeau and Yan 2007; see also Berinsky 1999), especially during the telephone interviews that generated the data we have discussed so far (e.g., Holbrook, Green, and Krosnick 2003; Holbrook and Krosnick 2009, forthcoming).”
Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior (2015, positive): “Such satisficing behavior manifests itself in nondifferentiation (giving the same answer to a battery of similar questions) and acquiescence response bias (the tendency to agree, regardless of the question content) (24).”
Self-disclosure, Privacy and the Internet (2009, background): “( Holbrook, Green, and Krosnick, 2003 ), there is little reason to assume that a similar”
Saving Face: Identifying Voter Responses to Black Candidates and Female Candidates (2016, background): “As Holtgraves (1992) writes, “face” is not an identity, but rather an individual’s self-presentation during a given moment or interaction, and individuals generally attempt to project the most positive face possible.”