Assessing the Impact of Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification On Sex-Offending Trajectories

By R. Tewksbury, Wesley G. Jennings. 2010

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a3471f0649609ce27f0c7189248c682f57707f03

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. P. Lussier
2. Catrien C. J. H. Bijleveld
3. L. Kelly
4. M. Horvath

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. Lussier
2. Catrien C. J. H. Bijleveld
3. Chantal van Den Berg
4. J. Hendriks
5. M. Horvath
6. L. Kelly

Citations in the corpus

• The Complexity of Public Attitudes Toward Sex Crimes (2017, unknown): “…suggesting these policies have little effect on sex offender recidivism (Letourneau, Levenson, Bandyopadhyay, Armstrong, & Sinha, 2010; Tewksbury & Jennings, 2010; Zandbergen, Levenson, & Hart, 2010), and may even exacerbate a released sex offender’s ability to successfully reintegrate (Levenson,…”
• A Developmental Taxonomy of Juvenile Sex Offenders for Theory, Research, and Prevention (2012, background): “…policies have stressed that their number is too low to justify current interventions (e.g., public notification, sex offender registry) based on the dubious assumption that JSOs are tomorrow’s adult sex offenders (e.g., Miner, 2007; Tewksbury & Jennings, 2010; Zimring, 2004; Zimring et al., 2007).”