R-free likelihood-based estimates of errors for phases calculated from atomic models

By Vladimir Y. Lunin, T. P. Skovoroda. 1995

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine (2012, methodology): “Since the atomic parameters and the bulk-solvent model are updated during refinement, the ML error model has to be updated correspondingly, as described in Lunin & Skovoroda (1995), Urzhumtsev et al. (1996) and Afonine et al. (2005a).”
Averaged kick maps: less noise, more signal…and probably less bias (2009, methodology): “The coefficients of the ML maps (Read, 1986; Pannu & Read, 1996; Murshudov et al., 1997) were computed as described in Lunin & Skovoroda (1995) and Urzhumtsev et al. (1996).”
Automatic multiple-zone rigid-body refinement with a large convergence radius (2009, unknown): “During minimization, an LS or an ML target function [implemented as defined by Lunin & Skovoroda (1995) and Afonine et al. (2005a)] is used.”
Checking your imagination: applications of the free R value. (1996, methodology): “Lunin and Skovoroda [ 8 ] have developed a method to estimate the magnitude of the phase error of a partial atomic model that contains errors.”
Metrics for comparison of crystallographic maps (2014, methodology): “These data are used for validation (Brünger, 1992) and to estimate statistical parameters (Lunin & Skovoroda, 1995; Pannu & Read, 1996; Murshudov et al., 1997).”
Likelihood-based refinement. I. Irremovable model errors. (2002, methodology): “…appeared previously in a number of crystallographic applications (Luzzati, 1952; Sim, 1959; Srinivasan & Parthasarathy, 1976; Read, 1986, 1990; Lunin & Skovoroda, 1995), may be rewritten in terms of the structurefactor magnitude and phase: P F; ' F " exp ÿ F 2 Fcalc 2 " exp 2 FFcalc " cos 'ÿ…”