Computerized adaptive testing : theory and practice

By W. D. Linden, Cees A. W. Glas. 2000

657 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62bd1ca6ded03d306609b496e1b8fb6d01689722

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. A. Pollitt
2. Jirka Vomlel

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Angelika Glockner-Rist
2. A. Pollitt
3. Jirka Vomlel
4. Herbert Hoijtink

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Angelika Glockner-Rist
2. A. Pollitt
3. Jirka Vomlel
4. Herbert Hoijtink

Citations in the corpus

• Bayesian Networks In Educational Testing (2002, methodology): “Almond and Mislevy (1999) proposed to use graphical models for CAT.”
• The method of Adaptive Comparative Judgement (2012, background): “…more efficient than traditional testing (e.g. Wainer 2000), but there are several significant problems with it (e.g. Reckase 2011; van der Linden and Glas 2000), such as transferring to on-screen testing, the need for a very large bank of items, for pre-calibration, for optimal selection…”
• The Best of Both Worlds: Factor Analysis of Dichotomous Data Using Item Response Theory and Structural Equation Modeling (2003, background): “For this purpose, sets of differently worded items are collected, which according to their psychometric characteristics, are equally suited to operationalize a substantive construct of interest (e.g., Masters & Evans, 1986; van der Linden & Glas, 2000).”